2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1161 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac Seville | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | Seville | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 33 L |
