2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1968 Oldsmobile 442
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 7,464 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 142 kg more than 1968 Oldsmobile 442.
Because 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Oldsmobile 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1968 Oldsmobile 442 | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | Seville | 442 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 7464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2850 mm |