2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 556 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | Seville | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1804 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |