2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (271 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 598 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (407 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Seville | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4563 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1748 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |