2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Donkervoort |
Model | Seville | S7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 163 Nm |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1080 mm |