2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1057 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac Seville | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | Seville | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2160 mm |
