2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 642 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | Seville | 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |