2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1387 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac Seville | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
| Model | Seville | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2320 mm |
