2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (265 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 23 kg more than 2000 Cadillac Seville.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Seville | E-150 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |