2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 2010 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Cadillac Seville. (290 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Cadillac Seville.

Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore. 2000 Cadillac Seville has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Cadillac Seville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: