2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 1959 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac XLR | 1959 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | XLR | 12 M |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1620 mm |