2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 1966 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1966 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 1022 kg more than 1966 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac XLR (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Renault Dauphine. (58 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac XLR | 1966 Renault Dauphine | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | XLR | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 428 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 58 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |