2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 1976 Renault 5

To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault 5 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1976 Renault 5. (33 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1976 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 939 kg more than 1976 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac XLR (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Renault 5. (53 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Renault 5.

Compare all specifications: