2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 1979 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 44 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac XLR | 1979 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | XLR | Impala |
Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |