2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 1981 Datsun 280
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1981 Datsun 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1981 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 224 kg more than 1981 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac XLR | 1981 Datsun 280 | |
Make | Cadillac | Datsun |
Model | XLR | 280 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 180 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1310 mm |