2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 1984 Dodge Lancer
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 454 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac XLR | 1984 Dodge Lancer | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | XLR | Lancer |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
