2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 1986 Lada 2105
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1986 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 654 kg more than 1986 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac XLR | 1986 Lada 2105 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | XLR | 2105 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
