2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 1996 Italdesign Legram
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Italdesign Legram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Italdesign Legram would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1996 Italdesign Legram. (147 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1996 Italdesign Legram.
Because 2000 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Legram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac XLR | 1996 Italdesign Legram | |
| Make | Cadillac | Italdesign |
| Model | XLR | Legram |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 147 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1300 mm |
