2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2003 Spyker C8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 304 kg more than 2003 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac XLR | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Spyker |
Model | XLR | C8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 3999 cc |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |