2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac XLR (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac XLR | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | XLR | TT |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 428 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1359 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |