2000 Cadillac XLR vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C (302 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Cadillac XLR. (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2000 Cadillac XLR.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac XLR (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mercedes-Benz C. (370 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mercedes-Benz C.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Cadillac XLR 2012 Mercedes-Benz C
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model XLR C
Year Released 2000 2012
Body Type Convertible Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 301 HP 302 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 428 Nm 370 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 7-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4606 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1392 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 66 L