2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1953 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,859 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 753 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 21 | 1953 Chevrolet Corvette | |
| Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
| Model | 21 | Corvette |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3859 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 90.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1293 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 60 L |
