2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1955 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 420 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 1955 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Caterham | Isuzu |
Model | 21 | Minx |
Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2370 mm |