2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Ford 12 M weights approximately 355 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 21 | 12 M |
Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2500 mm |