2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volkswagen 1500 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Caterham | Volkswagen |
Model | 21 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2430 mm |