2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW F 11 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Because 2000 Caterham 21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
Make | Caterham | DKW |
Model | 21 | F 11 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 889 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 7.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 31 L |