2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
Make | Caterham | Willys-Overland |
Model | 21 | Aero-Willys 2600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2636 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2740 mm |