2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1964 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Caterham 21 weights approximately 108 kg more than 1964 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 21 | 1964 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Caterham | Lotus |
| Model | 21 | Seven |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 432 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 29 L |
