2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1965 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1965 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1965 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 1965 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Caterham | Plymouth |
Model | 21 | Valiant |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2700 mm |