2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1967 MG MGB
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1967 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1967 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 MG MGB weights approximately 342 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham 21 (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 1967 MG MGB | |
Make | Caterham | MG |
Model | 21 | MGB |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 882 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2320 mm |