2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 270 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Because 2000 Caterham 21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 21 | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Caterham | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 21 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2310 mm |
