2000 Caterham 21 vs. 1986 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Honda Integra would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1986 Honda Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1986 Honda Integra.
Because 2000 Caterham 21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 2000 Caterham 21 has manual transmission. 2000 Caterham 21 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 21 | 1986 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Caterham | Honda |
| Model | 21 | Integra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 113 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1665 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2450 mm |
