2000 Caterham 21 vs. 2003 Holden UTE
To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 21 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2003 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden UTE weights approximately 960 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 21. (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM). This means 2003 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 21.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 2003 Holden UTE | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 21 | UTE |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2950 mm |