2000 Caterham 21 vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 21 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Spyker C8 weights approximately 675 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 21 | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Caterham | Spyker |
Model | 21 | C8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 100 L |