2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1945 Jeep CJ2
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep CJ2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep CJ2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Jeep CJ2 weights approximately 650 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Because 1945 Jeep CJ2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep CJ2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham 7 (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 1945 Jeep CJ2 | |
Make | Caterham | Jeep |
Model | 7 | CJ2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1945 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2040 mm |