2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 820 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham 7 (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Caterham | Triumph |
Model | 7 | Renown |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2750 mm |