2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1954 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (170 HP @ 10750 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 520 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 1954 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Caterham | Isuzu |
Model | 7 | Minx |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1137 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 10750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 8250 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2370 mm |