2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1956 DKW Universal
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Universal would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 DKW Universal weights approximately 465 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Because 2000 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 7 | 1956 DKW Universal | |
| Make | Caterham | DKW |
| Model | 7 | Universal |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 894 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2460 mm |
