2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1967 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,137 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (170 HP @ 10750 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1967 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1967 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Caterham 7 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1967 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 1967 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Caterham | Lotus |
Model | 7 | Seven |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1137 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 10750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2240 mm |