2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 2000 Caterham 7. (170 HP @ 10750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Matra-Simca M670 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 7 | 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Caterham | Matra-Simca |
| Model | 7 | M670 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1137 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 10750 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2570 mm |
