2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1972 Triumph TR6
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph TR6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph TR6 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph TR6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1972 Triumph TR6. (104 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph TR6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph TR6 weights approximately 625 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham 7 (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph TR6. (194 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph TR6.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 1972 Triumph TR6 | |
Make | Caterham | Triumph |
Model | 7 | TR6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 194 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2240 mm |