2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 760 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Because 2000 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 7 | 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
| Model | 7 | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1137 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2560 mm |
