2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 845 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham 7 (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Caterham | Jeep |
Model | 7 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2380 mm |