2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1991 Acura Integra
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 1991 Acura Integra | |
Make | Caterham | Acura |
Model | 7 | Integra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1137 cc | 1700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2560 mm |