2000 Caterham 7 vs. 1998 Volvo S90
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volvo S90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volvo S90 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Volvo S90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1998 Volvo S90. (177 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1998 Volvo S90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volvo S90 weights approximately 1112 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Volvo S90 (260 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 7. (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM). This means 1998 Volvo S90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 1998 Volvo S90 | |
Make | Caterham | Volvo |
Model | 7 | S90 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7200 RPM | 4350 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1572 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1450 mm |