2000 Caterham 7 vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (170 HP @ 10750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (145 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 7. (125 Nm @ 8250 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 7 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1137 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 10750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 8250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3060 mm |