2000 Caterham 7 vs. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX

To start off, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (170 HP @ 10750 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 1408 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.

Because 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 7. (125 Nm @ 8250 RPM). This means 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 7.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Caterham 7 2003 Isuzu D-MAX
Make Caterham Isuzu
Model 7 D-MAX
Year Released 2000 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1137 cc 2999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 170 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 10750 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 8250 RPM 2000 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 440 kg 1848 kg
Vehicle Length 3110 mm 5030 mm
Vehicle Width 1580 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1010 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 3060 mm