2000 Caterham 7 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Caterham 7. (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 2028 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 7. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 7 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3510 mm |