2000 Caterham 7 vs. 2011 Nissan NP300

To start off, 2011 Nissan NP300 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (170 HP @ 10750 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2011 Nissan NP300. (112 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan NP300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan NP300 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan NP300 (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 7. (125 Nm @ 8250 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 7.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Caterham 7 2011 Nissan NP300
Make Caterham Nissan
Model 7 NP300
Year Released 2000 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1137 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 170 HP 112 HP
Engine RPM 10750 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 169 Nm
Torque RPM 8250 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 440 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 3110 mm 5180 mm
Vehicle Width 1580 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1010 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2960 mm