2000 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 7 (230 HP) has 146 more horse power than 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon. (84 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon.
Because 2000 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham 7 | 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon | |
Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
Model | 7 | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 84 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2390 mm |